Ännu en artikel som visar på det bedrägliga med de PCR-tester som används. Det verkar som att de är det perfekta verktyget för att skapa en pandemi, eller illusionen av en pandemi.
How accurate are the covid tests?
As you can see, the less prevalent the disease is in reality, the more likely the test is to generate a false positive result, and the less useful the test is as a method for figuring out who actually has covid. And the less prevalent the disease is, the more prevalent it will seem to be in relation to reality. If decisions about covid continue to be made largely based on what PCR tests show, we might never be able to call off the pandemic!
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why PCR positive cases are a very poor indicator of how prevalent covid is in the population, and why we should instead be basing decisions on the rates of hospitalization, ICU admission, and death. If we just look at the PCR tests, we will continue to believe that the disease is widespread in the population indefinitely, even as it becomes less and less common in reality. And that is assuming the rate of testing doesn’t increase. If we combine this built-in problem with accuracy, with a massive increase in testing (as has happened in most countries over the course of the pandemic), then we can create the impression of a disease that is continuing to spread wildly through a population, even when it isn’t.
I ett inlägg från New York Times från 2007 beskrivs hur man pga dessa PCR-tester lurades att tro att man hade en kikhoste-epedemi på ett sjukhus i USA. Tester gav en massa positiva svar. Det var inte förrän någon försökte odla fram ett kikhoste-virus från prov som det upptäcktes att någon kikhosta inte fanns.
Det kan vara denna erfarenhet som har använts i planeringen inför pågående kampanj!
The big message is that every lab is vulnerable to having false positives,” Dr. Petti said. “No single test result is absolute and that is even more important with a test result based on P.C.R.
Mike Yeadon, expert med många års erfarenhet och som haft hög position hos Pfizer.
The PCR testing machinery is, at best, greatly in error and completely misleading. I have good knowledge of mass testing systems. I have always been deeply worried about polymerase chain reaction (PCR) because of its power, not only to find one molecule as small as a broken fragment of viral RNA and amplify it, sometimes by two to the power of 40, through repeated cycling, but also because it can find something that is not there – it can yield a ‘positive’ result even though the virus is not present.
PCR-tekniken som används i test för att påvisa virus kan inte skilja på virus med förmåga att infektera celler och virus som oskadliggjorts av immunförsvaret och därför kan man inte använda dessa test för att avgöra om någon är smittsam eller inte.
Pascal Sacré – The COVID-19 RT-PCR Test: How to Mislead All Humanity. Using a “Test” To Lock Down Society
It is time for everyone to come out of this negative trance, this collective hysteria, because famine, poverty, massive unemployment will kill, mow down many more people than SARS-CoV-2!
Från England, 500 akademiker i ett brev till landets ledning, 8 nov –
Official data is ‘exaggerating’ the risk of Covid and talk of a second wave is ‘misleading’, 500 academics tell Boris Johnson in open letter attacking lockdown
Official data is ‘exaggerating’ the risk of Covid-19 and talk of a second wave is ‘misleading’, nearly 500 academics told Boris Johnson in open letter attacking lockdown.
The doctors and scientists said the Government’s response to the coronavirus pandemic has become ‘disproportionate’ and that mass testing has distorted the risk of the virus.
They said tests are likely to be producing high numbers of ‘false positive’ results and the Government must do more to put infection and death rates within the context of normal seasonal rates.
‘Alongside this we have the issue that it is normal to see an increase in illness and deaths during the winter months.
‘It is notable that [the] UK death rate is currently sitting around average for this time of year. The use of the term ‘second wave’ is therefore misleading.