Det här citatet visar varför västs finans-ayatollor var helt oresonliga, Libyen skulle tas till vilket pris som helst. (Eller ska man inte säga ”var”, det låter som att man givit upp. När det fortfarande finns de som kämpar med sitt liv som insats för att driva tillbaka angriparna. Men det ser tufft ut, västmedierna har ett strupgrepp på minst 95% av folken tack vare en sällan skådad propagandaoffensiv. Och i Tripoli satsar världens största krigsmakt 100% på att ta över.)
”It is a test that the international community has to pass. Failure would shake further the faith of the people’s region in the emerging international order and the primacy of international law.”
-Brookings Institute’s ”Libya’s Test of the New International Order,” February 2011.
Från Tony Cartaluccis – Libya: War for World Government, 28 mars i år.
The ”international community” that feckless stooges like Joe Lieberman talk about,
or his French equal in impotency, Nicolas Sarkozy’s ”new post-UNSC 1973 model of world governance
” are concepts not born of these ”elected representatives,” but rather the product of the corporate think-tanks that hand them their talking points. It is the corporate-financier oligarchy that constitutes the ”international community” and who aspires to rule through ”world governance.” Their goal is to eliminate national sovereignty and assert their agenda and the laws & regulations to achieve it homogeneously across all national borders.
Indeed, this is not a war of America, the UN, NATO, or the European Union. The feckless politicians that pose as our leadership are merely taking orders from the powers that be – the corporate-financier oligarchs. If we are to frustrate these oligarchs, we would be wise to waste little time on their front men and instead get straight to the issue. Boycott these corporations and systematically replace them on a local level. While they wage war to eliminate the nation state, from its borders down to our own individual rights and liberties, we must wage a campaign to undermine and eliminate them, from their crass consumerist networks that infest our towns, to the parasitic monstrosity that is the international banking system which infests this planet.
While they must wage their battle through murder, lies, and deceit, we must wage our battle through constructive pragmatic solutions, ingenuity, hard work, community, and self-sufficiency. This is not a war for Libya – this is a war for world government, that if won by the globalists, means our defeat as well.
Om man bara stod och gapade efter den kompakta kombinerade media och militärattacken mot Tripoli den senaste veckan, så gapar man om möjligt ännu större när man ser det här!
Russia Today har intervjuat John McCain – Democrazy: McMouth flies ‘freedom’ flag
”McCain is sure that the Arab Spring will rage on and will make it to countries like China and Russia, which according to him “need democracy” just as Libya does.”
”And according to him the “next stop” is Syria. “After Gaddafi it is Bashar Assad who is next to fall,” McCain said.”
Uppenbarligen ligger finans-ayatollorna i den högsta ledningen efter i sitt tidsschema och har gett order om att nu lägger vi i en högre växel, vi kan inte hålla med så mycket tidskrävande falskspel längre. Vi får vara mer rakt på sak och tala om vad som gäller!
Mer tecken på desperation – Gaddafi manhunt: rebels and NATO close in –
”British Tornado jets have fired cruise missiles at Colonel Gaddafi’s command and control bunker in his hometown of Sirte, despite previous claims the coalition would not assist rebels in hunting him down. The colonel’s whereabouts are still unknown.”
Ännu ett inslag från Russia Today – Was the CIA behind the Gaddafi oust? –
Congressman Dennis Kucinch has suggested that the CIA has had a role in the start-up of the Arab Spring this year. Jack Rice, a journalist and former officer at the CIA himself, says it is not that unlikely at all.
“Let’s be honest,” Rice said to RT. “The CIA is involved in every place that they try to get involved in. They try to be on the ground in every major country in the region.”
“To deny this,” thinks Rice, “would be naive.”
VÄNTA,VÄNTA! Det allra värsta kommer här, hur stort kan man gapa egentligen!?
thecable.foreignpolicy.com – White House: Obama method for regime change better than Bush method
This week’s toppling of the Qaddafi regime in Libya shows that the Obama administration’s multilateral and light-footprint approach to regime change is more effective than the troop-heavy occupation-style approach used by the George W. Bush administration in Iraq and Afghanistan, a top White House official told Foreign Policy today in a wide-ranging interview.
”The fact that it is Libyans marching into Tripoli not only provides a basis of legitimacy for this but also will provide contrast to situations when the foreign government is the occupier,” said Ben Rhodes, deputy national security advisor for communications, in an exclusive interview on Wednesday with FP. ”While there will be huge challenges ahead, one of the positive aspects here is that the Libyans are the ones who are undertaking the regime change and the ones leading the transition.”
Jag vet inte vad det är för sida den där foreignpolicy.com, är det satir!?
Despite criticism from Congress and elsewhere, President Barack Obama’s strategy for the military intervention in Libya will not only result in a better outcome in Libya but also will form the basis of Obama’s preferred model for any future military interventions, Rhodes said.
”There are two principles that the president stressed at the outset
[of the Libya intervention] that have borne out in our approach. The first is that we believe that it’s far more legitimate and effective for regime change to be pursued by an indigenous political movement than by the United States or foreign powers,”
”Secondly, we put an emphasis on burden sharing, so that the U.S. wasn’t bearing the brunt of the burden and so that you had not just international support for the effort, but also meaningful international contributions
Rhodes said that the United States is not going to be able to replicate the exact same approach to intervention in other countries, but identified the two core principles of relying on indigenous forces and burden sharing as ”characteristics of how the president approaches foreign policy and military intervention.”
Det måste vara någon sorts satir! Det är ju säkert sant att de resonerar så, men att man säger det öppet! Är det den nya given, att säga öppet som det är? De flesta reagerar inte ändå, och för de som gör det är det bara en signal att; se här, vi vann!! Vi gör precis som vi vill, försök gör något åt det om ni kan!