inga bevis på att Khadaffi använt övervåld

Knähundsmedia öser ut lögner och propaganda dagligen om Libyen, och det är ju bara Khadaffi och de som försvarar attacken mot landet som demoniseras. Påståenden som inte har någon trovärdighet om att klusterbomber används och att det är Khadaffis attacker mot civila som är problemet. Riktigt motbjudande och otäckt! Här ett par inslag för att väga upp och få lite balans på rapporteringen.

No Evidence Of Gaddafi Violence, Say Britons

The Libyan government has renewed its call for independent fact-finding experts to come to the country to assess allegations of violence against civilians.
Speaking to Sky News, deputy foreign minister Khalid Kaim said: ”We are asking for professional fact-finding missions.

”We asked the British government for this in the first week of the conflict but never received a reply. When we have claim and counter-claim, this is unacceptable.”

It comes as the United Nations outlines plans for a humanitarian team to be sent to the besieged city of Misratah.

It also follows the surprise finding of a British campaign group who claimed they had seen ‘no evidence’ that Colonel Gaddafi’s forces had attacked, bombed or killed any civilians in western Libya, despite widespread condemnation of the regime from organisations such as the UN, the African Court of Human Rights and the International Criminal Court.

In their interim findings, the campaign group claimed they had been able to ”corroborate civilian casualties and fatalities due to Nato bombing” but ”could find no evidence that three areas of Tripoli cited in UN resolution 1973 had been subjected to government forces bombardment”.

Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey – Open letter to David Cameron

As you will be aware, the United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1970 (2011) and 1973 (2011) set our very clearly and unambiguously the terms and conditions for your policy in Libya, namely that it is not allowed to supply weapons to anyone in that country, neither is it allowed to take sides – you are to enforce a no-fly zone to protect civilians.

Firstly, could you explain the reasons why several TV channels have confirmed that arms have been supplied to the ”unarmed civilians” fighting the Government forces in Misrata?
Secondly, could you also explain the rumours that weapons have been supplied to the ”unarmed civilians” across the (already secured) frontiers to the west (Tunisia) and east (Egypt). Convenient, what?
Thirdly, would you be so kind as to explain what your concept of an ”unarmed civilian” is, because the ones I have seen on my TV screens are bearded Islamist fanatics chanting Allahu Akhbar, looking most unsavoury. Pucker savages…Hardly the type of chap to invite to Aunty Mabel’s dinner party, eh what?

So David Cameron, let us now move on to the theft of thirty billion dollars in bank accounts which Muammar Al-Qathafi had earmarked for development projects across Africa. Actually let’s be honest about things. Muammar Al-Qathafi has pissed too many people off, has he not?

Not for being a dictator (which dictator hands out a million weapons to his people, which dictator strolls around his capital city carefree, have you noticed how popular he is among those who are not bearded Islamist fanatics sporting automatic weapons and trained by the CIA?) because in March the UNO was to give him a special commendation precisely for his excellent humanitarian record. Not for being a terrorist because there is ample proof that other dark forces were involved in Lockerbie (never trust the French, eh?).

Mr. Cameron, is it not true that Muammar Al-Qathafi has financed a myriad of development projects across Africa which meant that instead of this continent being forced to pay hundreds of billions of pounds in crippling interest rates to those pot-bellied pigs who control your banks, they can finance themselves with lower interest rates? Is it not true, Mr. Cameron, that Muammar Al-Qathafi financed the Pan-African telecommunications project which meant that Africa at last had its own satellites and did not need to pay a rent of 500 million pounds a year to your chaps? And why didn’t Britain, in its centuries of colonial history or due to its colonial legacy, do something even remotely similar?

In fact, Cameron, Muammar Al-Qathafi has done a site more for his country and Continent than you ever have, or ever will. While he provides free housing, you create the conditions for people to lose their homes. While he provides free education, you increase University fees to 9,000 pounds a year. While he provides free healthcare, you close hospitals at home and bomb them abroad.


* GDP per capita – $ 14,192.
* Unemployment benefit – $ 730.
* Each family member subsidized by the state gets annually $ 1.000
* Salary for nurses – $ 1.000.
* For every newborn is paid $ 7.000.
* The bride and groom receive a $ 64 thousand to purchase flats.
* Major taxes and levies prohibited.
* To open a personal business a one-time financial assistance of $ 20.000
* Education and medicine are free.
* Educ.Internships abroad – at government expense.
* Stores for large families with symbolic prices for basic foodstuffs.
* Part of pharmacies – with free dispensing.
* Loans for buying a car and an apartment – no interest.
* Real estate services are prohibited.,
* Buying a car up to 50% paid by the State.
* No Payment for electricity for the population.
* Sales and use of alcohol is prohibited.
* Petrol is cheaper than water. 1 liter of gasoline – $ 0.14.

Jail the Banksters; Libya Lies – Sunday update –



Publicerat i Libyen. 2 Comments »

2 svar to “inga bevis på att Khadaffi använt övervåld”

  1. HCA Says:

    Fakta är ju inget som man direkt öser ut över folket, inte heller använder man logik eller bra jämförelser..
    Ok, låt säga ATT de använder klusterbomber.
    Ställ det mot Israels användning av vit fosfor i Gazakriget, eller USA/NATO’s användning av utarmat uran.
    Vart är medias fördömanden och krigsrubriker kring dessa brott?

    Läst på många ställen att Libyen inte är det helvete man vill påskina, och även om Khaddafi säkerligen inte är helt oskyldig sas, så mår tydligen folket utmärkt.
    Om folket vore så grovt missnöjda, varför är det så många som kämpar mot rebellerna?
    Rebeller som om det vore USA, GB, Sverige, Frankrike osv skulle ses som fullblodsterrorister förresten, och säkerligen skulle få tillbringa många decennier på Guantanamo eller snabbt få sin vila ”six feet under”..

    Det är märkligt hur olika man ser på samma saker.
    Men det mest obehagliga är ändå medias otroliga makt, och hur fel de använder den. I mina ögon är det tamigfan värre än landsförräderi, för de förråder stora delar av mänskligheten i sin extrema propaganda.

    • Stan Says:

      Sverige var ett av de länder som inte ville skriva på för ett totalförbud av klusterbomber för ett par år sen om jag inte minns fel. Sverige är det land som exporterar mest vapen per invånare!
      Håller helt med det du skriver, särskilt det sista stycket. Om världen och Sverige vaknar upp och lyckas stoppa och kasta av sig tyrannerna, hur ska t.ex. gänget på Dagens Eko kunna ses som annat än avskyvärda landsförrädare!?

Skriv här

Fyll i dina uppgifter nedan eller klicka på en ikon för att logga in: Logo

Du kommenterar med ditt Logga ut / Ändra )


Du kommenterar med ditt Twitter-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )


Du kommenterar med ditt Facebook-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )


Du kommenterar med ditt Google+-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Ansluter till %s