Ellen Brown om Libyen

Oj, oj, oj, jag har i och för sig varit inne på det här tidigare. Att anledningen till att Libyen absolut inte kan få lov att vara i fred kanske är att man lyckats lite för bra och kunde bli ett farligt exempel för andra. Men här kommer Ellen Brown med en artikel som gör att man blir än mer övertygad om att det är så det ligger till. Libya: All About Oil, or All About Banking?

De 7 länder den här amerikanske generalen fick information om 2001 att skulle invaderas på 5 år, hade det gemensamt att de inte hade en centralbank som var underordnad det internationella (privatkontrollerade) systemet med högkvarter i Schwiez, BIS.

The most renegade of the lot could be Libya and Iraq, the two that have actually been attacked. Kenneth Schortgen Jr., writing on Examiner.com, noted, ”[s]ix months before the US moved into Iraq to take down Saddam Hussein, the oil nation had made the move to accept Euros instead of dollars for oil and this became a threat to the global dominance of the dollar as the reserve currency and its dominion as the petrodollar.According to a Russian article titled ”Bombing of Lybia – Punishment for Ghaddafi for His Attempt to Refuse US Dollar,” Qaddaffi made a similarly bold move: he initiated a movement to refuse the dollar and the euro and called on Arab and African nations to use a new currency instead, the gold dinar. Qaddafi suggested establishing a united African continent, with its 200 million people using this single currency. During the past year, the idea was approved by many Arab countries and most African countries. The only opponents were the Republic of South Africa and the head of the League of Arab States. The initiative was viewed negatively by the USA and the European Union, with French President Nicolas Sarkozy calling Libya a threat to the financial security of mankind; but Qaddafi was not swayed and continued his push for the creation of a united Africa.

Ett citat av Eric Encina från Ellens artikel:

One seldom mentioned fact by western politicians and media pundits: the Central Bank of Libya is 100% State Owned…. Currently, the Libyan government creates its own money, the Libyan Dinar, through the facilities of its own central bank. Few can argue that Libya is a sovereign nation with its own great resources, able to sustain its own economic destiny.
One major problem for globalist banking cartels is that in order to do business with Libya, they must go through the Libyan Central Bank and its national currency, a place where they have absolutely zero dominion or power-broking ability. Hence, taking down the Central Bank of Libya (CBL) may not appear in the speeches of Obama, Cameron and Sarkozy but this is certainly at the top of the globalist agenda for absorbing Libya into its hive of compliant nations.

T.ex. har man ju som jag tagit upp tidigare genomfört ett ganska fantastiskt projekt och byggt en människotillverkad flod som leder vatten från en stor underjordisk reservoar till delar av landet som är i stort behov av vatten, och man kan odla på ställen där man inte kunde tidigare. Pepe Escobar: ”This Water Pipelineistan – buried underground deep in the desert along 4,000 km – is the Great Man-Made River Project (GMMRP), which Gaddafi built for $25 billion without borrowing a single cent from the IMF or the World Bank (what a bad example for the developing world).”
Man månar alltså om sin nationella suveränitet och självbestämmande och driver landet i folkets intresse.
Här lägger man ner enormt arbete på att hjärntvätta i stort sett hela världen till att tro att allt måste ägas och drivas av privatkontrollerade bolag. Och att alla, stater såväl som befolkningarna måste skuldsätta sig och vara skuldslavar åt privatbankerna. Att livet går ut på att tjäna storbolagen och storfinansen, man ska vara jävligt glad att man får lov att existera överhuvudtaget, och så riskerar man att Khadaffi ska komma och sabotera allt!

En must read-artikel, och must spread!

Alex Newman – “Libyan Rebels” Create Central Bank, Oil Company

As analysts debate possible motives behind President Obama’s United Nations-backed military intervention in Libya, one angle that has received attention in recent days is the rebels’ seemingly odd decision to establish a new central bank to replace dictator Muammar Gadhafi’s state-owned monetary authority — possibly the first time in history that revolutionaries have taken time out from an ongoing life-and-death battle to create such an institution, according to observers.

The U.S. government and the U.N. have both recently announced that the rebels would be free to sell oil under their control — if they do it without Gaddafi’s National Oil Corporation. And the first shipments are set to start next week, according to news reports citing a spokesman for the rebels.
But the creation of a new central bank, even more so than the new national oil regime, left analysts scratching their heads. “I have never before heard of a central bank being created in just a matter of weeks out of a popular uprising,” noted Robert Wenzel in an analysis for the Economic Policy Journal. “This suggests we have a bit more than a rag tag bunch of rebels running around and that there are some pretty sophisticated influences.”

Wenzel also noted that the uprising looked like a “major oil and money play, with the true disaffected rebels being used as puppets and cover” while the transfer of control over money and oil supplies takes place. And other analysts agreed.

Globalists Target 100% State Owned Central Bank of Libya

It is becoming easy to diagnose the very root-causes of chaos in the Middle East and the ongoing war-attacks against Libya. Finance, oil, militarization & imperialism, globalization- all of these comprise a running agenda for the New World Order. Egypt and Tunisia have both fallen to interim military dictatorships and have been hooked with billions in cheap loans from the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and the World Bank.Any country or nation that is running against the grain of this agenda- going against the orthodoxies of the New World Order, will eventually be flagged and brought to heal by way of military hammer. Regular acts of war against these non-globalist nation states are designed to humiliate, degrade and compromise international human rights- a condition that has become embarrassing to the world at large.

-

Publicerat i Libyen. 3 Comments »

3 svar to “Ellen Brown om Libyen”

  1. Kerstin Says:

    Och såvitt jag vet så har de s.k. rebellerna redan bildat en ny ”normal” bank och gjort överenskommelser med Väst om olja mm.

    • Stan Says:

      Ja, är det inte ganska unikt, att man i ett läge där det pågår inre oroligheter i ett land bara går in och bildar en ny centralbank och ger klartecken till en ”rebell”-grupp att själva sälja olja och gå förbi landets regering!
      Nog tyder det på desperation hos de som styr väst, alltså inte de som folken tror styr utan de som i praktiken gör det.
      Hur länge ska medierna kunna köra med sina lögner och propaganda?

  2. Motvallsbloggen » Nu börjar andra röster om och från Libyen höras i USAe Says:

    […] besiege Libya will not stand, The Washinton Times 3) ”Khaddafi är villig att utlysa val”, DN 4) Ellen Brown om Libyen, StAn 5) The Middle East counter-revolution, Thierrya Meyssan, Voltairenet.org 6) Farligast för kvinnor […]


Skriv här

Fyll i dina uppgifter nedan eller klicka på en ikon för att logga in:

WordPress.com Logo

Du kommenterar med ditt WordPress.com-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Twitter-bild

Du kommenterar med ditt Twitter-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Facebook-foto

Du kommenterar med ditt Facebook-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Google+ photo

Du kommenterar med ditt Google+-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Ansluter till %s